H.J.
Mulliner enjoyed a fine reputation for most elegant lines and this Rolls-Royce
Phantom III is but another example for magnificent coachwork produced
by the bodybuilder located in Brook Street, Mayfair. Hence quite close to
Rolls-Royce Ltd’s’ offices and showrooms in London’s Conduit Street.
Sedanca de Ville coachwork had been ordered for this car, i.e. a saloon
with a division including a completely opening top to the chauffeur’s
compartment. The de ville extension combined three major parts, a centre
panel that could be pushed back and two side rails fixed on rear hinges,
all of which disappeared neatly when stowed “inside” the main roof.
Not
just the most carefully executed roof construction but every component of
the coachwork showed H.J. Mulliner’s desire of attention to detail. The
coachbuilder’s attitude was on a par with that of Rolls-Royce, because
quality standards head and shoulders above that of competitors, basis of
the car manufacturer’s success, was the result of accepting the very
best only strictly with no compromise.
The
Rolls-Royce Phantom III was powered by a light alloy engine of 7.4 litres
with 12 cylinders in V-configuration. The engine design had benefited from
the experience Rolls-Royce had gained in producing record-braking
aero-engines. - Perhaps one or the other heard comments on the expense of
overhauling Phantom III V12-engines. This is a good opportunity to state
that to overhaul a Phantom II 6-cylinder in-line engine is virtually as
costly, running the same several ten thousand US$ (or whatever equivalent
in your native country’s currency) at a commercial shop. (It is slightly
less expensive if one can do the monkey work one’s self). Engine’s
from a Silver Ghost or Phantom I are in the same range, also. A fair view
needs to consider that any overhaul of an engine almost 70 years old
depends on what had been demanded from the unit during its lifetime and
whether or not correct maintenance had been cared for…

|